Waxless (fishscale) bases provide reliable kick grip across a wide range of snow conditions without any wax application, which is extremely convenient for backcountry touring where conditions change constantly. The trade-off is slightly reduced glide efficiency on firm snow due to the scaled pattern creating friction. Waxable bases offer potentially better glide and more precise grip when correctly waxed, but require knowledge of kick waxing and the right wax for current conditions—a significant hassle in the backcountry. For 90% of Nordic backcountry skiers, waxless bases are the practical choice. Experienced Nordic skiers who prioritize maximum glide efficiency may prefer waxable bases.
Skis · Nordic Backcountry / Touring Skis
How do waxless fishscale bases compare to waxable bases for backcountry touring?
Related gear types
If this answer nudged you toward a different style, these guides compare specs and trade-offs.

Alpine Touring (AT) / Backcountry Skis
$450 – $1200
Lightweight skis designed for uphill skinning travel and downhill performance in the backcountry.
Lightweight constructionWaist width 85–110mmRocker-camber profiles for mixed snow

Cross-Country Classic Skis
$120 – $650
Narrow, lightweight skis designed for the classic diagonal stride technique on groomed nordic tracks.
Narrow waist (40–50mm)Long length relative to skierSpecific camber for kick and glide

Cross-Country Skate Skis
$150 – $700
Shorter, stiffer nordic skis built for the skating technique on groomed skate lanes.
Shorter than classic skisStiffer camber profileWaist 41–45mm
More questions
- Can I use climbing skins with Nordic backcountry skis?
- What is the difference between NNN-BC and 3-pin bindings?
- Do I really need metal edges on Nordic backcountry skis?
- Can I ski Nordic backcountry skis at a resort?
